Posted on January 26th, 2016 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: _Tanderrum Bridge, Things We Like, Urban Design

You can help name the new footbridge NADAAA and JWA have designed that will connect Melbourne Park and Birrarung Marr by crossing over Batman Avenue. Vote HERE. (P.S. We’re still partial to “Batman Bridge”)



Comments Off on #NAMETHEBRIDGE

Batman Bridge in Context

Posted on January 25th, 2016 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: _Tanderrum Bridge, construction, Urban Design

Get a glimpse of the next phase of the Melbourne Park Redevelopment with a flyover of Batman Bridge.


Comments Off on Batman Bridge in Context

Construction progress in Austin

Posted on November 24th, 2015 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: construction, Urban Design

Over 750 pre-cast 8x8x14 concrete posts are being fabricated in green, blue, yellow, light grey and charcoal for the new Seaholm Electric Substation urban wall. This urban wall will not only veil an existing power substation, but offer subtly programmed experiences to the emerging neighborhood surrounding Austin’s new Central Library, an urban bike-way, and several mixed use developments.

seahom piers construction

Comments Off on Construction progress in Austin

One Spadina featured on Urban Toronto

Posted on May 21st, 2015 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: _Daniels Building, Press, Urban Design

Urban Toronto takes a look at construction progress at One Spadina. The future home of the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture Landscape and Design is a collaboration between NADAAA and Adamson Assoicates, Architect of Record.

Read the full article here.


Comments Off on One Spadina featured on Urban Toronto

Architecture Urbanism Humanities Symposium

Posted on May 5th, 2015 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: Events, Lectures, Urban Design

Video from the recent Brown University and RISD joint symposium Intersections in Pedagogy.

Stan Allen speaks on Architecture and the Humanities and Nader discusses Rethinking Pedagogical Spaces:

“a great part of what design thinking brings to the equation is the notion that there is a necessity for iteration, a necessity for risk and the idea that only through critical failure might you stumble across spaces of invention.”


Also, see Bernard Tschumi’s lecture from the night before here.



Comments Off on Architecture Urbanism Humanities Symposium

New Age Old Town

Posted on April 30th, 2015 by Katie Faulkner

Posted under: Things We Like, Urban Design

Since March 1, I have read Casey Ross’ A New Age for an Old Town dozens of times.  The Boston Globe feature is interesting on a number of fronts; Mr. Ross describes our current “golden age of building” within the context of earlier waves of the 19th and 20th centuries that produced some of the city’s most beloved landmarks.  He takes us back to the 1964 construction site of the Prudential Tower, and even quotes John Hynes referring to Boston as the “Athens of America.”  The best thing about the article however, is the link to the sidebar graphic – a collection of articles chronicling 52 buildings that have either been provisionally approved or have actually started construction.  There is remarkable similarity among the images, and it is tempting to sort the buildings into piles: the plane-slippers, the wrapper-shifters, and the skirt-lifters.  In short, most are variations on the theme of maximizing a floor plate.

According to Casey Ross, and generally backed up by the BRA website, there is 34 million square feet of new building in the near-term Boston pipeline – this is Boston alone.  Imagine if we could add in Cambridge and Somerville. Within that number are other interesting stats.  At least 7 of the proposals are legitimate skyscrapers; 63% of the projects have a significant residential component, and most often the housing is paired with a hotel.  There are 29 development teams financing these projects, although there are recombinations and LLC’s that make it hard to count the players.  In a subsequent letter to the editor, architects Mark Pasnik and Michael Murphy note that Ross’ list of projects illustrates that development is an “insider’s game.”  They point out that two architecture firms are producing nearly a third of the 52 projects but stop short of revealing that Elkus Manfredi is involved with 25% of them.  In total there are about a dozen firms in the mix, with Miami’s Arquitectonica winning the “traveled the farthest” award.

If it hasn’t happened already, the City will soon designate a development team for the Winthrop Street Garage.  Ten years ago we would have called this Trans National Place.  At that time, developer Steve Belkin had engaged Renzo Piano to design a 1,000 foot tower.  The details of that project are the stuff of legend, and the upshot is that one cannot build a super-tower so close to Logan Airport.  Nonetheless, Belkin gets points for raising the architectural bar.  The original proposal had elegant proportions and tectonic heft that somehow gave unity to the eclectic volumes of Downtown. The reincarnation of the project promises to be both shorter and less inspired, but it will nonetheless take its place on Boston’s skyline as a marker of this our 21st century “golden age of building.”

Trans National Place designed by Renzo Piano

Trans National Place designed by Renzo Piano


Harvard professor Edward Glaeser wrote that “(r)eally tall buildings provide something of an index of irrational exuberance,” and he points to the iconic Empire State and Chrysler Buildings as examples.  To his point, towers generally go up in economic boom times, and emerging economies continue to show their might by sponsoring increasingly stunning and tall buildings.  In contrast, Boston towers do not tend to be particularly tall, and the City seems not to see them as icons of our urban greatness, which is a shame because once it is up, a tower becomes an indelible part of our identity.  Much as we might like to erase One International Place, it’s not going anywhere.

Construction of the Empire State Building

Construction of the Empire State Building


As I was penning this blog, Rachel Slade published her scathing “Why is Boston so Ugly?” piece in Boston Magazine.  This is the article many of us have wanted to write but could not articulate.  She called out the visual affront of 111 Huntington, and the lost opportunities of the Seaport District.  The conventional wisdom that it is hard to get anything built in Boston is called a bluff.  It is actually ridiculously easy to build just about anything if you know the right people.   Ms. Slade takes on the BRA and exposed the long tenure of the BCDC members.  Most endearing was that she listed NADAAA among the “most vigorous design firms,” although I did not appreciate her assessment that firms like ours lack the capacity for big buildings.  Capacity is not the issue.  Jonathan Levi Architects won the Harleston Parker medal with an 84,000 square foot public school and the firm has designed millions of square feet of institutional, residential, and educational buildings.  Anmahian Winton Architects have a high-rise under construction in Ankara.  David Hacin has mid-rise residential buildings all over town, and is in fact one of the prospective design teams for Winthrop Square.  NADAAA just completed the 250,000 square foot Melbourne School of Design, the result of an open international competition, and has larger projects in design and construction. What binds the work of these firms together is not their relatively small size. The common thread is architectural intent, which unfortunately has become separated from the merely functional as if to say that the added value of design is luxurious excess.  Undaunted, Rachel Slade looks for bigger fish out of town and references significant buildings in New York and Chicago, cities with a legacy of great architectural ambition and civic pride.  In her assessment, Boston comes up short and she is right. With notable exceptions, Boston developers are generally indifferent to design. At a ULI meeting last year, a prominent Boston developer admitted that ultimately he does not care what his buildings look like.  There are complex negotiations, oversight agencies, fickle markets, and prescribed profit margins to be dealt with — this is perhaps why few locals hang out in the Seaport District.  Ultimately one does need to care.


Ankara Office Building designed by Cambirdge-based Anmahian Winton Architects

Melbourne School of Design by Boston-based NADAAA

Melbourne School of Design by Boston-based NADAAA


The combination of the current gilded age with a new administration has provided an opportunity to correct the trajectory of the current building boom, and there are guiding principles to light the way.  First, Boston’s built environment should reflect the region’s rich culture, and the ambition of what we’d like to be.  Architecture carries the weight of history as well as the demonstration of invention, technology and civilization.  Related to this is the obligation to be respectful of the historical layers of our urbanism without being imitative or mocking.  Second, it is incumbent upon all constructors – designers, policy makers, and builders – to respect a kind of Hippocratic oath.  Do no harm, and when possible advance social well-being.  Architecture has the power to mediate certain landscape and urban challenges in ways no other medium can.  Consider the legacy of Mecanoo/Sasaki’s Bolling Municipal Building.  Surely it deserves some credit for the fact that for the second quarter in a row (according to Boston Business Journal), Roxbury’s Dudley Square neighborhood ranked as the Commonwealth’s hottest real estate market. Finally, one should not separate the functional from the courageous; a well-designed building is not a luxury, it is a basic right like clean water, functional infrastructure and access to the Internet.  By separating the practical from the beautiful, we are all but guaranteeing bad design, undermining our potential as a progressive city. When our own mayor joins the chorus by calling Boston’s latest bumper crop of buildings “merely functional”, it is time to expect more.

Mayor Marty Walsh  Photo from Bostoninno

Mayor Marty Walsh, photo from Bostoninno

Comments Off on New Age Old Town

Seaholm Wall Progress

Posted on April 16th, 2015 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: construction, Urban Design

Under construction in the heart of downtown Austin, Texas, a one-thousand four-hundred foot screen wall is taking shape. Situated along Shoal Creek and several adjacent developments including the New Central Library, the project helps to secure an active power station and create urban spaces along its perimeter. The wall will employ over eight hundred 8 x 8 x 12 foot tall integrally colored concrete posts with varying patterns and rotations.

southeast corner-2-blog


Process color studies



Comments Off on Seaholm Wall Progress


Posted on April 2nd, 2015 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: Events, Urban Design


Nader will join Sheila Dillon, Daniel D’Oca, Tim Love, and Edward Nardi to jury the second BSA Urban Design Workshop tonight from 6:00pm – 8:00pm in the BSA Space. The presentations will focus on potential housing growth on Dorchester Avenue in South Boston and will be led by Brian Healy FAIA, Eric Höweler AIA, Beth Whittaker AIA, and the BSA Emerging Professionals Network.

Register here.





Posted on February 1st, 2015 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: _Tanderrum Bridge, Press, Urban Design

NADAAA and John Wardle Architects have teamed up again to design a new pedestrian bridge connecting two major parks in Melbourne. The new bridge is being created as part of the Melbourne and Olympic Parks Masterplan. Read more here.

Screen Shot 2015-02-01 at 5.33.53 AM



Posted on December 15th, 2014 by Nicole Sakr

Posted under: Press, Urban Design

Nader writes on urban challenges and Megacities in MoMA’s “Uneven Growth”, now available through the MoMA Store. The publication is tied to their current exhibition running through May 10th.